Retrieval-Augmented Generation Frameworks for Trustworthy Enterprise AI Systems
Main Article Content
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have accelerated the adoption of artificial intelligence across enterprise applications, enabling natural language interfaces for tasks such as document search, customer support, software development, and business analytics. Despite these advances, standalone LLMs often generate inaccurate or unverifiable responses because their outputs rely primarily on knowledge acquired during pre-training. This limitation poses significant challenges in enterprise environments, where decisions must be based on current, organization-specific, and traceable information. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses this challenge by combining semantic information retrieval with generative language models, allowing responses to be grounded in trusted enterprise knowledge sources. This article examines the architecture of enterprise RAG systems, covering document ingestion, embedding generation, vector indexing, retrieval strategies, prompt augmentation, and response synthesis. It also reviews mechanisms that improve trustworthiness, including source attribution, access control, governance, and human oversight. A comparative discussion of widely used RAG frameworks highlights their suitability for enterprise deployment, while current implementation challenges and emerging directions such as Graph RAG, Agentic RAG, and multimodal retrieval are also discussed. The study demonstrates that RAG has become a key architectural approach for building enterprise AI systems that are more accurate, transparent, and adaptable to continuously evolving organizational knowledge
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
[1] Wu, Shangyu, Ying Xiong, Yufei Cui, Haolun Wu, Can Chen, Ye Yuan, Lianming Huang et al. "Retrieval-augmented generation for natural language processing: A survey." arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.13193 (2024).
[2] A. A. Kamalipour and S. Asadi, "From Vectors to Knowledge Graphs: A Comprehensive Analysis of Modern Retrieval-Augmented Generation Architectures," Computer Science Review, vol. 2026, Art. no. 100925, 2026.
[3] J. Deng et al., "Data-Centric Perspectives on Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey," Findings of ACL 2026, pp. 1570–1588, 2026.
[4] S. Gao et al., "Scaling Beyond Context: A Survey of Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Document Understanding," Proceedings of ACL 2026, pp. 4458–4489, 2026.
[5] Ren,J. (2026). A comprehensive survey of knowledge Graph-Augmented Generation (Graph-RAG) for trustworthy large language models. Advances in Engineering Innovation,17(2),21-35.
[6] Y. Li et al., "A Survey of RAG-Reasoning Systems in Large Language Models," Findings of EMNLP 2025.
[7] A. Gan et al., "Retrieval Augmented Generation Evaluation in the Era of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey," arXiv:2504.14891, 2025.
[8] X. Zheng et al., "Retrieval Augmented Generation and Understanding in Vision: A Survey and New Outlook," arXiv:2503.18016, 2025.
[9] S. Gupta, R. Ranjan, and S. N. Singh, "A Comprehensive Survey of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Evolution, Current Landscape and Future Directions," arXiv:2410.12837, 2024.
[10] Y. Hu and Y. Lu, "RAG and RAU: A Survey on Retrieval-Augmented Language Model in Natural Language Processing," arXiv:2404.19543, 2024.